Take a tour with Joe, Doug and Sam Bullock on their Orcas Island homestead, site of a yearly Permaculture design course. Using nature as their model, they create edges and wildlife habitat, move water through the landscape, promote diversity, and raise an astonishing variety of plants from sub-arctic to tropical — a wise investment in these climate-changing times.
The future is abundant, asserts permaculture designer Larry Santoyo. His vision of living in the present provides a wonderful antidote to fear about uncertain futures. People need to rediscover that we’re part of the ecosystem, and apply permaculture design principles to the many problems we face. Larry teaches sustainable permaculture design as a discovery of the world around us. He notes that trying to be self-sufficient is really anti-permaculture. Instead, we need to develop self-reliance skills. Then as we find others in our communities to interact with, everybody gets to play!
If I could embed this movie in the blog I would. Click the link and watch.
http://breadcrumb.tv/~admin/streaming/in_transition_preview.mov
The following article - Is Humanity Fatally Successful? :-The following chart, if projected into our energy declining future, will show a
is by William E Rees co-originator of the Ecological Footprint approach in which
he makes the following statements:-
"What eco-footprinting shows is that, in ecological terms, the Dutch don't live in
Holland. Similarly, urban dwellers don't "live" in their cities; urbanization simply
separates us from the productive ecosystems that sustain us but lie far beyond
the urban boundary. An apt analogy is "the city as human feedlot." Like the city,
a livestock feedlot is an area with an extraordinarily high density of consumer
animals and a corresponding major waste management problem. Cities and
feedlots are incomplete ecosystems - the productive land component is some
distance away."
"If we are interested in conserving in non-human life on Earth, it might just be
that the greatest disaster that could befall the ecosphere is for humans to
discover another cheap, super-abundant source of energy to replace fossil
fuels. If there’s no change in the consumer values and behavioral
characteristic of high-income countries – in other words, no change in the
ways in which we use energy to exploit nature – then the present pattern of
biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation will continue on an even
grander scale. This would spell calamity for the non-human world, whatever
short term good it might be for humans."
"For all its positive functions, the human capacity for self delusion does
have a perverse side. As Derek Jensen (2000) has argued, there are
times such that for us to maintain our way of living, “…we must tell lies to
each other and especially to ourselves. These lies act as barriers to truth
[and] the barriers are necessary because, without them, many deplorable
acts would become impossibilities.” In these circumstances, the power
of the myth disallows consideration of contrary evidence, including the
best of scientific data."
"Little wonder that humanity becomes ever more dominant – half the
world’s forests have been logged, half the land on earth has been modified
for human use, 70% of the fish stocks are in jeopardy, carbon dioxide levels
are up by 30% in this century, and biodiversity loss is accelerating. These
are remarkably massive impacts considering they are caused by a species
whose mental constructs consider it to be essentially decoupled from “the
environment” and unaffected by the consequences of ecological change.
This is no minor cognitive lapse. Once we’ve separated ourselves mentally
from “the other,” then it doesn’t much matter to us what happens to the other.
But if the separation is only myth (and the empirical data show that the human
enterprise is a fully embedded –subsystem of the ecosphere)then what
happens to “the other” becomes absolutely critical to our own future survival."
